Quality improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors

The Quality improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors is available on the Education Scotland website.

It is important to note that the Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland will begin to use the new framework for inspection from September 2025.

This will allow settings to become familiar with its content and structure. The final version of the framework will be formally launched in autumn 2025.

Frequently asked questions

Here are some frequently asked questions (FAQs) we have compiled with help from stakeholders to accompany the framework. These address some of the key points raised with us so far. We will keep these FAQs updated as new questions arise.

Where can I access the Quality improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors?

The Quality improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors is available on the Education Scotland website. PDF versions of the new framework will be available in due course. 

Will it be clear which quality indicators Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland will focus on?

The Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland have worked together to minimise the burden on settings by reducing the number of quality indicators (QIs) from 28 in the current frameworks to 11 in the new framework.

Both inspectorates have made it clear within the framework which QIs relate to the Care Inspectorate and which relate to Education Scotland. Each organisation will determine how these QIs will be used during their inspections and on shared inspections.

Why are there not weak illustrations for all QIs?

In response to stakeholder feedback, the inspectorates are developing weak illustrations for all QIs and these will be included in the next version of the framework.

Why is there no separate transitions QI?

Both inspectorates recognise the importance of transitions at all stages of development and learning.

Planning, managing and supporting children’s transitions is key to all areas of the framework and should therefore be considered in each QI rather than separately in isolation.

We will provide further support on how this is exemplified in the framework in future engagement sessions with practitioners to support reflection on transitions as part of self-evaluation and during future approaches to inspection.

Can the QIs be numbered for ease of reference?

Our focus is on the quality of children’s experiences across all areas of the framework. In order to meet user accessibility requirements, QIs have not been numbered and we would encourage the use of their full titles. For ease of reference, services should focus on the wording of the QI, for example ‘play and learning’.

Will the Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland use shared grading criteria?

The Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland worked together to develop shared grading criteria.

This will be considered during the pilot phase and further discussion will take place between the two bodies regarding a consistent approach to the evaluation of adequate/satisfactory.

The Care Inspectorate will retain the term ‘adequate’ for the time being, in order to align with the National Standard, and Education Scotland will retain the term ‘satisfactory’.

Will the framework be tested and is there an opportunity to provide feedback to inform any further refinement?

The Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland will test content of the framework in a number of settings during the next pilot phase of the project. This piloting will be undertaken both separately and jointly.

During the pilot phase, both the Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland will ask for feedback from settings about the QIs to inform any further refinements needed.

What are the arrangements for settings involved in the pilot phase?

The Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland invited settings to volunteer to be part of the pilot phase to test the new framework. We had a great response with more than 200 settings offering to participate.

We will reflect on the best way to involve as many settings as possible while also ensuring a balanced sample of visits. We will notify those settings that have been selected to participate in advance. Participants will be provided with guidance and information to support them during the pilot so that they know what to expect.

What is the timeframe for full implementation the framework?

The Quality improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors was released online on January 14 2025. This will allow settings to become familiar with its content and structure. The final version of the framework will be formally launched in autumn 2025.

The Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland will begin to use the new framework for inspection from September 2025. Our inspections will continue to focus on the experiences and outcomes for children and young people.

What happens to How good is our early learning and childcare and A quality framework for daycare of children, childminding and school-aged childcare?

The current frameworks will continue to be used for inspections until implementation of the new framework.

From September 2025, the Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland will begin inspections using the new the Quality improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors only. This framework replaces both How good is our early learning and childcare and A quality framework for daycare of children, childminding and school-aged childcare.

When do we need to start using the new framework?

We understand that settings will adopt the new quality improvement framework when it best suits them, and that there will be a transition period as settings move away from using the existing frameworks.

You may want to continue to use the existing framework until you are ready to adopt the new framework fully.

Both inspectorates will engage with settings to support them to become familiar and confident in using the new framework for self-evaluation.

Will there be support for settings with their own self-evaluation using the new framework?

The Care Inspectorate and Education Scotland will deliver sessions on self-evaluation using the new framework from spring 2025. We will provide further detail of these sessions in due course.

Will there still be separate inspections? If yes, will they have their own frameworks? 

Both inspection bodies will use the new framework for separate and shared inspections from September 2025. There will be no other frameworks used for inspection from that point on. 

The QIs that each inspectorate body may use in the final inspection methodology will be confirmed when the new approach to inspections has been developed and agreed. In the framework, we have made it clear which QIs relate to the Care Inspectorate and which relate to Education Scotland.

How will childminders who offer funded ELC be inspected? 

Both inspectorates have agreed that the childminding-specific content in the new framework is appropriate for the requirements of the National Standard and that the Care Inspectorate will continue to inspect childminders (including those delivering funded places). 

Childminders do not need to self-evaluate using any other QIs from the framework. Education Scotland do not have any plans to inspect childminders.

Is there a Gaelic version of the new framework?  

The new framework for the early learning and childcare sectors will continue to be developed and refined as we move through the pilot phase. We will ensure a Gaelic version of the framework is available when the framework is launched in autumn 2025.

Read more

Joint inspections of adult support and protection

Background

Phase 1 of our programme of joint inspections of adult support and protection took place during 2020-2023. Twenty-five joint inspections were carried out, and individual partnership reports were published. An overview, summarising the findings in these reports was also published, and is available here. This shaped our subsequent phase 2 approach. 

Phase 2

In June 2023, the Scottish Government asked the Care Inspectorate to lead further joint inspection work with our inspection partners including, Healthcare Improvement Scotland and His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland. This commenced on 1 August 2023 and is scheduled to conclude in July 2025, and blends scrutiny activity with improvement support. There has been close collaboration with adult protection partnerships throughout.

The programme provides assurance on the quality of adult support and protection services in Scotland and promotes improvement activity through the development of a quality indicator framework and supported self-evaluation. Phase 2 of the programme comprises four workstreams. 

Workstream 1

The joint inspection of the six adult support and protection partnerships first inspected in 2017. 

The first year of our phase 2 programme included reviewing the progress of the six adult protection partnerships that were subject to adult support and protection inspections in 2017/18. The joint inspection team used the inspection methodology employed in Phase 1. These inspections focused on key processes and strategic leadership. 

This programme of inspections was completed in May 2024 and included the North AyrshireHighlandDundeeAberdeenshire, East Dunbartonshire and Midlothian partnerships. Individual reports of the inspections have been published and can be accessed using the links above.

A joint inspection of adult support and protection overview report took account of the key findings from these six reports. This was published and can be accessed here.  

Workstream 2

Development of a multi-agency quality improvement framework (QIF) for adult support and protection partnerships in Scotland. 

Design of the QIF was undertaken in collaboration with The Scottish Government National Implementation Group self-evaluation subgroup. Four consultation workshop events took place, to which representatives from all health and social care partnerships across Scotland were invited. This included events in Glasgow, Edinburgh, and Dundee, as well as one online session. These were held to provide an opportunity for the sector to comment on, refine, and enhance the draft framework. The sessions were attended by approximately eighty-four delegates representing almost all Health and Social Care Partnerships and the feedback gathered was then used to inform the final document. 

  • A working group was established that included joint inspection partners and representation from the national implementation group.
  • The working group took careful consideration of the views from people with lived experience to ensure it was trauma informed. 
  • A communication plan was designed and implemented and four well attended engagement sessions were arranged
  • The joint inspection team undertook a ‘you said, we did’ exercise with the national implementation self-evaluation subgroup to review the key themes from the four engagement sessions. We refined the QIF following their feedback. 
  • The QIF was published on 15 October and can be accessed here.
  • This document will be promoted widely across the sector after its launch at a series of national events.
  • This includes a formal launch at the Aspire event that took place on 28 November 2024
  • This framework will support partnerships multi-agency self-evaluation of their adult support and protection arrangements and is designed to lead to improvement in services. 

Workstream 3

This review of progress activity provides assurance of improvement in those partnerships where areas of weakness outweighed strengths in phase 1. This programme involves the South Ayrshire, Moray, West Lothian, Edinburgh, Orkney, and Western Isles partnerships.

Our file reading tool had previously been updated to reflect the changes in methodology and take account of the Scottish Government revised code of practice for adult support and protection (July 2022).

Completed workstream 3 progress reviews include South Ayrshire, West Lothian, Edinburgh and Moray. Individual reports will be published in due course for all six partnerships.  

In these progress reviews we are using the following evaluations to measure progress. 

Minimal progress: Improvement is minimal. The partnership’s overall approach to improvement is not comprehensive or put into practice. Its deployment and implementation are limited. It has not embedded improvements or they are still at the planning stage. It does not communicate improvements effectively and they are not well understood by staff. It does not assess and review the effectiveness of its improvement progress.   

Some progress: Evidence of some improvement.  The partnership’s approach to improvement is moderate.  Its implementation and deployment of improvements are structured.  It is beginning to embed improvements in practice.  It communicates improvements partially and staff understand them reasonably well.   It has limited measures to evaluate and review impact and outcomes for adults at risk of harm.  It periodically assesses and reviews its improvement methodology. 

Significant progress: Significant improvement. The partnership’s approach to improvement is comprehensive and embedded. Its deployment of improvements is well structured, implemented and effective. It communicates improvements purposefully, and staff understand them fully. It has effective measures to evaluate and review impact and outcomes for adults at risk of harm. It continually assesses and refines its improvement methodology.

The joint inspection team will also be re-visiting the Renfrewshire partnership to complete their phase 1 inspection that was interrupted by Covid-19 restrictions coming into force in March 2020. 

Workstream 4  

The joint inspection of adult support and protection team aims to work with volunteer partnerships, using the quality improvement framework developed in workstream 2, to undertake a programme of supported self-evaluation. Our focus will be on quality illustration 5.7 and those cases where it is difficult to determine the three-point criteria. During phase 1 activity some partnerships had promising initiatives aimed at developing their early intervention, prevention, and trauma informed approaches to this complex group of adults at risk of harm. We will work jointly with partnerships to assess the strengths of these initiatives.

This is an opportunity for partnerships to work alongside the joint inspection team to develop and implement the methodology. We will share learning and promote a deeper understanding about self-evaluation approaches and its impact on improvement work.

We have invited all adult support and protection partnerships to formally express a confirmed interest in this opportunity week commencing Monday 11 November 2024. We will look to confirm the partnerships selected prior to the end of December 2024 and commence work with them in January 2025.

A communication and engagement plan will be put in place once we have identified the partnerships we will be working with. 


Related links:  

Read more

More information about this self-evaluation

We will undertake this self-evaluation in two phases.

Phase 1: National self-evaluation – 2 September to 20 November 2024

All local authorities will be asked to undertake a self-evaluation against Quality Indicator 6.4: Performance Management and Quality Assurance, using a specially developed tool. The below online briefing provides an overview of the approach, the templates and the submission process.

The Care Inspectorate team will analyse the responses to identify key strengths and challenges emerging from the evaluations.

Phase 2 – Validation activity – 20 January to 24 February 2024

The Care Inspectorate will select four local authority areas and will work with them to validate their self-evaluation. This will include review of documentary evidence and focus groups with staff and people who use services.

Participating local authorities will receive a validation letter and feedback on their self-evaluation.

A final thematic report will be prepared summarising the findings of the national self-evaluation and the key messages emerging from the validation activity. This will reflect national messages and share information about examples of innovative practice – findings will not be attributed to individual local authorities.

What you will need

We have developed a blank template, with guidance, to support you to undertake the self-evaluation. This template is available in word to allow you to develop your responses over time and share it with colleagues. However, final submission of the self-evaluation will be via the smart survey. If you have used the word version of the template to compile your responses, please paste your answers in to our smart survey using the link below.

This is the link to the smart survey for submission. This link will go live on Monday 2 September. Please make your final submission on or before Wednesday 20 November.

We have provided an exemplar of what a completed self-evaluation template may look like for your reference and guidance. We have also provided a Quality Indicator 6.4 illustration

For further information on privacy in relation to how this review is conducted please see our privacy statement.

Read more

Policy position on the use of restrictive practices

Introduction

Everyone in health and social care has a role to play in upholding people’s rights. This includes the right to person centred and trauma informed care and support. Restrictive practice which includes restraint, seclusion, segregation and other less direct practices may form part of a person’s plan of care or support. This includes all people from infants and children, through to young people, adults, and older people. This policy states our position on the use of restrictive practice in all services, to ensure this being the ‘last resort’ and where the risks and benefits to the person have been considered within a legal, ethical and practical framework. This statement should be read in conjunction with the guidance for specific services.

Definition

Restrictive practice is defined as making someone do something they do not want to do or stopping them from doing something they do want to do, by restricting or restraining them, or depriving them of their liberty.1

Restrictive practices relate to different types of restraint. This can be physical, mechanical, chemical, cultural, environmental or psychological restraint, surveillance or blanket rules.

Policy position statement

The Care Inspectorate is committed to upholding and promoting human rights and the rights of the child. These rights may only be restricted as a last resort, including in the use of restraint. The use of restrictive practices, including physical restraint, must be considered within a context of the conflict in the promotion of rights, independence and choice for children and adults, versus promoting and maintaining our duty of care.2 In law3, the use of force in any form is required to be justifiable, reasonable and proportionate. Practitioners may be required to take protective action to keep children and adults safe from harm that may affect rights, including choice, dignity and freedom. However, this must be delivered within a context of positive risk taking and compassionate care.

Legislation and standards

Whilst there is no specific piece of legislation that focusses on restraint, the Care Inspectorate is guided by the following legislation and standards.

The Social Care and Social Work Improvement Scotland (Requirements for Care Services) Regulations 2011, which specifies:

  • under welfare of users that “A provider must ensure that no service user is subject to restraint, unless it is the only practicable means of securing the welfare and safety of that or any other service user and there are exceptional circumstances” (4(1)(c)).
  • under fitness of premises that “Accommodation must not be provided and used for the purpose of restricting the liberty of children in any residential premises where care services are provided unless such provision and use have been approved by the Scottish Ministers” (10 (3)).

The Health and Social Care Standards, which set out that:

  • “If my independence, control and choice are restricted, this complies with relevant legislation and any restrictions are justified, kept to a minimum and carried out sensitively” (1.3).
  • “My care and support meets my needs and is right for me” (1.19).
  • “Any treatment or intervention that I experience is safe and effective” (1.24).
  • “I experience warmth, kindness and compassion in how I am supported and cared for, including physical comfort when appropriate for me and the person supporting and caring for me” (3.9).
  • “I am protected from harm, neglect, abuse, bullying and exploitation by people who have a clear understanding of their responsibilities” (3.20).
  • “I experience care and support free from isolation because the location and type of premises enable me to be an active member of the local community if this is appropriate” (5.9).
  • “If I experience 24 hour care, I am connected, including access to a telephone, radio, TV and the internet” (5.10).
  • “I can independently access the parts of the premises I use and the environment has been designed to promote this” (5.11).
  • “If I live in a care home, I can control the lighting, ventilation, heating and security of my bedroom” (5.12).

  1.  CQC 2023
  2. Civil law
  3. Common law
Read more

Self-evaluation of performance and quality assurance in justice social work

This justice social work self-evaluation will focus on the current capacity of services to evidence performance, quality and outcomes in relation to community based sentences. The self-evaluation activities will be undertaken in two phases between September 2024 and March 2025. A national report will be published in May 2025.

The approach to this work will be informed by Quality Indicator 6.4 (Performance Management and Quality Assurance) which is drawn from the Care Inspectorate’s Guide to Self-Evaluation for Community Justice in Scotland. The aim is to develop a clear understanding of strengths and develop an evidence-base that informs local and national improvement initiatives.

By using a self-evaluation approach rather than a traditional inspection model, we hope to minimise the burden on local authorities whilst building capacity for improvement across the sector.

Useful links: 

Read more

Subcategories